Links
Archives
- 08/01/2003 - 09/01/2003
- 09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003
- 10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003
- 11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003
- 12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004
- 02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004
- 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004
- 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004
- 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004
- 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004
- 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004
- 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004
- 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005
- 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005
- 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
- 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
- 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
- 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005
- 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005
- 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006
- 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006
- 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006
- 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006
- 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007
- 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007
- 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007
- 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007
- 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007
- 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007
- 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007
A media "watchdog" site commenting on inadequacy and inaccuracy in coverage of news events. While it has a distincly political emphasis, it will comment on other cultural issues.
Monday, October 25, 2004
Iraq, the IAEA, and 380,000 Tons of Explosives: Let me get this straight. If we are to believe Mr. Kerry, fired-general Wes Clark, and a chorus of others, Saddam was no threat and had no WMD. And today we find out that the IAEA was tracking 380,000 tons of high explosives that are now missing.
The IAEA is an international Nuclear Treaty monitoring agency. Why would an international Nuclear Treaty monitoring agency be tracking explosives in Iraq if Iraq had no WMD or nuclear program?
Any curiosity on the part of "The Media"? I thought not.....
The IAEA is an international Nuclear Treaty monitoring agency. Why would an international Nuclear Treaty monitoring agency be tracking explosives in Iraq if Iraq had no WMD or nuclear program?
Any curiosity on the part of "The Media"? I thought not.....
